As founders, we mostly hear the polished versions of success. The names we recognize already have distribution, brand, and a tidy origin story. But the early names rarely make the cut: Google was “Backrub.” Stripe was “/dev/payments.” Instagram was “Burbn.” Slack came out of a game studio called Tiny Speck. We remember the museum piece, not the workbench.
At Structured Labs, one of our core values is simple: Iterate, Adapt, Win. It’s not a motto; it’s a posture. The path is non-linear by design. We cross disciplines—developer tools, infrastructure, operations—because the edges are where the interesting answers hide.
The Survivorship Trap
Survivorship bias makes us think winners followed a straight line. In reality, distribution writes the history and smooths the edges. Early-stage companies are messy: names change, scope shifts, stacks get rebuilt. The brand you know is often the last chapter of a very different first draft.
Quick illustrations:
-
Backrub → Google: an academic project became an internet utility.
-
/dev/payments → Stripe: a hackerish directory name matured into a developer-first payments platform.
-
Burbn → Instagram: a check-in app shed features until only photos remained.
-
Tiny Speck → Slack: a tool built for a game team became the product.
The lesson: your job isn’t to guess the perfect story early—it’s to keep generating good next chapters.
Non-Linear Paths Are a Feature, Not a Bug
Our best insights at Structured Labs rarely arrive on schedule. We’ve built things from a developer tools lens, then realized the win was an infrastructure abstraction. We’ve talked to SREs, finance ops, and platform teams, and only months later did the throughline snap into focus.
One example: we prototyped a simple observability helper to surface runtime context for engineers. Customer conversations pulled us toward repeatable environment orchestration. The tool changed shape; the problem stayed the same—reduce friction between code, infra, and operations. That shift didn’t come from a single meeting. It was the accumulation of adjacent truths.
The Loop: Iterate, Adapt, Win
Here’s how we operationalize it:
-
Iterate: Ship small, tight feedback loops. Fewer bets, faster turns.
-
Adapt: Reframe with new information. Rename, refactor, reposition.
-
Win: Define “win” as learning velocity until the signal is undeniable. Then double down.
Practical Tactics for Founders
-
Track learning rate, not just growth rate. Count experiments per month and decisions reversed.
-
Increase surface area for luck. Talk to improbable users outside your category (ops, finance, support) not just your obvious ICP.
-
Version your story. Keep a dated one-pager of your thesis. When it changes, write why. Patterns emerge.
-
Kill with kindness. If a path isn’t compounding, stop quickly and salvage primitives.
-
Blur artificial boundaries. Organize work around problems, not departments. Dev tools can be go-to-market; operations can be product.
Closing Thought
The lines we draw in the sand get redrawn by the tide. Don’t memorialize them. If you stay flexible, humble with your story and ruthless with your learning, the company you’re building today doesn’t have to match the company you’re destined to become. Iterate, adapt, win. Then do it again.
